SEVEN has put out a press release describing their calendar integration to mobile email and PIM for their supported handsets (currently listed as 450). They are working hard to reach further into operators by listing carrier-side support for gmail and calendering issues as a main feature.
SEVEN Launches Google Calendar Integration for Mobile Devices.
While this is the right path for SEVEN to pursue in extending mobile email and calendering from web-based services to mobile phones, in a way I find it amazing that carriers have yet to think and act beyond providing connectivity. Why aren't carriers demanding a personalized or contextualized version of such a service where calendar updates are time and location sensitive (e.g. auto-sms or email notice to participants if you are running late, on a another call, etc)?
Why aren't they working on a UI that is specific to handet classes--if not specific handsets--instead of just trying to port a PC-based web experience to a tiny screen? If players from Zimbra through Xobni, Clearcontext, etc. are trying to do better than Outlook on the web why in the world isn't anyone tyring to do better for email and calendar experiences in mobile?
The danger of this product roadmap for SEVEN, Visto, and SyncML-based players is that user uptake flips to interacting directly through different experiences and they are left high and dry with all their investments in a roadmap designed to support use cases that are suddenly irrelevant. This could happen sooner than one might think through expansion of Twitter or RSS use cases, of Facebook or MySpace or Youtube overlays which replace email and IM and calendering, or productization of any of these through third party standalone apps released through app stores.
Mobile Email Tops Voicemail, Says Seven
Mobile Email Tops Voicemail, Says Seven - WIRELESS AND MOBILE NEWS.
SEVEN has done an interesting survey claiming that voicemail and email are a bit of an either-or communications preference for businesses, and that IM lags substantially behind email.
In my (non statistically relevant) experience companies tend to be culturally inclined toward either voice or email. Most technology companies I work for are either email or IM dominated for reaching someone or getting an answer. However service firms I've worked with, and for, are primarily voice oriented.
I've always thought the type of work you did created different demand types. Service firms often rely heavily upon context and conveying that is easier through voice. Tech firms often need fairly straightforward info bits which is fastest thru email, text, or IM.
October 14, 2008 in Mobile Email, Mobile industry commentary, Mobile Startup Tracker, SEVEN | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)